What changed on December 1, 2025, what it means for your costs, and what questions to ask.
If you're a freight forwarder using CargoWise, you've likely noticed something different about your recent invoices. Or perhaps you received the October 31, 2025 notification about "CargoWise Value Packs" and you're still trying to understand what it means for your business.
You're not alone. The rollout of WiseTech's new pricing model has triggered what industry publication The Loadstar called "a level of agitation rarely seen around a software update."
Now that we're well into 2026, the picture has become clearer but not necessarily better. Forwarders who received their first invoices in January reported widespread confusion over billing, with unexpected "Transitional Pricing Protection" adjustments and numbers that don't match what they were told to expect. The dust hasn't settled. If anything, the questions are getting louder.
This guide breaks down exactly what changed, what forwarders are reporting about cost impacts, and the questions you should be asking before your next invoice arrives.
On December 1, 2025, WiseTech Global transitioned approximately 95% of CargoWise customers to a new commercial model called "CargoWise Value Packs." This replaces the seat and transaction license (STL) model that had been in place since 2014.
The Old Model (Pre-December 2025):
The New Model (Value Packs):
Based on industry reporting, the new per-transaction fees include:
|
Transaction Type |
Fee |
|---|---|
|
Full import container with inland leg |
$19.95 |
|
Standalone import customs entry |
$9.95 |
|
Export shipment |
Varies by complexity |
|
Customs-only job |
Single fee structure |
Source: Journal of Commerce, December 2025
WiseTech positions the Value Packs as a comprehensive offering:
The pitch is "simplified billing" with everything bundled into one transaction-based fee.
While WiseTech frames the change as simplification, forwarders are reporting significant cost increases.
According to the Journal of Commerce:
|
Reported Impact |
Details |
|---|---|
|
Low-end increase |
20% |
|
High-end increase |
50%+ |
|
Typical mid-range |
25-35% |
One forwarder told JOC they expected a 25-35% cost increase despite historically projecting only 10% annual growth in their CargoWise spend.
Industry analysts report even broader cost impacts. According to freight tech commentator Anthony Miller, shippers moving 100,000 TEUs annually face $1.5M to $2.4M in additional costs depending on service tier. Some LinkedIn commenters like Serkan Kavas reported "~50% price increases with limited transparency."
"You're introducing fees to a price-sensitive market that doesn't have a track record for paying this fee." — Robert Petti, CEO of Prompt Global
"Every dollar counts for a forwarder's bottom line." — Logistics technology provider CEO
"I'm scared to death every time I see a bill, I get a headache." — Branch manager at a mid-size forwarder with offices in US and Asia
Beyond cost, forwarders have raised concerns about how the transition was handled:
Anthony Miller, a freight tech commentator and former WiseTech insider, summarized the industry reaction:
"The new commercial model is quite brilliant... the execution? Not good. Not good at all."
Miller documented specific execution failures:
This follows a pattern Miller has previously documented with WiseTech: system outages with poor communication, unclear messaging around acquisitions like Blume Global and Envase Technologies, and what he calls "excuses, not good ones" when challenged.
The first round of invoices under the Value Pack model arrived in January 2026, and they have deepened concerns rather than resolved them.
According to The Loadstar, customers are encountering a line item called "Transitional Pricing Protection" or TPP on their invoices. WiseTech describes this as an adjustment that ensures "pricing does not change during the transition from the prior pricing model." In theory, it sounds reassuring. In practice, it has created more confusion.
Some forwarders reported that their invoices effectively matched their old pricing, with the TPP adjustment making up the difference. That raises a difficult question: is this a temporary cushion before the real increase kicks in, or is this what the new model actually looks like? Nobody seems to know for sure, and WiseTech has not clarified when the transitional period ends.
One technology provider put it bluntly: "If I were a forwarder, I'd anticipate this being the new normal."
By February 2026, The Loadstar described the industry as standing at a "crossroads." The conversation has shifted. Forwarders are no longer just grumbling about costs. They are actively exploring alternatives, requesting demos from competing platforms, and in some cases beginning migration planning. What started as frustration over a pricing change is turning into a broader reckoning about vendor dependency.
Understanding WiseTech's rationale helps contextualize the decision, even if it doesn't change the impact on your business.
WiseTech CEO Zubin Appoo positioned the change as:
The financial markets have responded positively. Broker Jefferies estimates the new pricing will generate approximately 6% uplift in CargoWise annualized revenue in FY26 and FY27.
WiseTech's share price has surged since the announcement, with analysts noting the revenue upside of shifting costs toward cargo owners.
WiseTech's dominant market position in freight forwarding software enables this kind of pricing restructure. As The Loadstar reported, many forwarders feel "trapped" with limited alternatives that match CargoWise's comprehensive functionality.
According to the Journal of Commerce, CargoWise commands approximately 70% of the forwarding software market, and WiseTech Global has a $16 billion market capitalization. The company's $2.1 billion acquisition of E2open in May 2025 further extends its reach by enabling direct shipper access.
WiseTech suggests the automation fee "can be treated as a disbursement and passed directly on to your customer for recovery."
But can you actually do this?
The Journal of Commerce reported widespread skepticism:
"This [cost] will likely be eaten by forwarders. The choice of using CargoWise is the forwarder's, not the [beneficial cargo owner's]." — Industry observer
Industry professionals confirm the challenge. Amit Maheshwari, a freight technology executive, commented: "Passing costs through to the shipper or consignee is very very hard in the commodity freight brokerage business," noting this could "narrow margins even further if you can't pass it through."
George Sanchez, another industry observer, agreed: "If you try to pass this on to your shippers, you will find that this will be very difficult." He cited a standard industry truth: "Forwarders are in a commoditized business" where cost pass-through creates competitive vulnerability.
The core challenge: shippers view freight forwarding as a commoditized service. In a competitive market, adding a new "technology fee" line item risks losing business to competitors who absorb the cost.
One industry analyst compared it to "Taco Bell charging customers for their SAP license." Customers don't expect to see their vendor's software costs on an invoice.
There's no universal right answer. But assuming you can simply "pass it through" without customer impact is optimistic.
If you're a CargoWise customer, here are ten questions to help you understand your new cost structure:
What "Transitional Pricing Protection" adjustments appeared on your early 2026 invoices? If you see TPP line items, you need to understand whether your current bill reflects your final pricing or a temporary cushion. Ask WiseTech directly: when does TPP end, and what will your invoice look like after it expires?
Request a detailed projection from your WiseTech account representative. Get it in writing. Compare it to your actual 2025 monthly spend. And specifically ask for clarity on your TPP timeline.
If your cost analysis reveals significant increases, you have several paths forward:
Some forwarders report success negotiating transitional pricing or volume discounts. It's worth asking, especially if you're a larger customer.
If you're paying for features you don't use, the new model might actually benefit you since everything is included. Review your actual usage patterns.
Many forwarders are using this moment to seriously evaluate whether CargoWise is still the right fit. And "seriously" is the key word here. This is no longer a hypothetical conversation.
By early 2026, industry publications report that the pricing changes have pushed forwarders from quietly wondering about alternatives to actively exploring them. The Loadstar notes growing interest in competing platforms, open source TMS solutions, and even custom built approaches by larger forwarders. Rival providers are gaining real attention for the first time in years.
The market has evolved. Mid size forwarders now have options that genuinely did not exist five years ago. Modern freight forwarding software offer comparable functionality with pricing models that are predictable and transparent.
For a comprehensive comparison of your options, see our Complete Guide to CargoWise Alternatives.
For some forwarders, CargoWise remains the best fit despite the cost increase. If you genuinely use the platform's advanced capabilities and global network, the value may justify the price. The question is whether you are paying for what you actually use, or paying for a platform built for companies much larger than yours.
This pricing change reflects a broader dynamic in logistics software. Enterprise platforms are monetizing their market position, while cloud-native alternatives are offering simpler, more predictable pricing models.
The question isn't just "how much does CargoWise cost?" It's "what's the right software investment for your business?"
For mid-size forwarders processing 200-500 shipments monthly, paying enterprise prices for a fraction of enterprise functionality may not make sense. The December 2025 pricing change has made that calculation more stark.
The CargoWise pricing story is still unfolding. Several developments will shape how this plays out over the rest of the year.
The end of Transitional Pricing Protection. If your current invoices include TPP adjustments, your real costs under the Value Pack model may be higher than what you are seeing today. Nobody outside WiseTech knows exactly when TPP expires, and that uncertainty alone should be a planning concern. The conservative move is to budget for the full Value Pack rate and treat any TPP benefit as temporary.
WiseTech's financial results. Broker Jefferies, reported by Journal of Commerce, projects a 6% revenue uplift from the new pricing model in FY26 and FY27. When WiseTech reports earnings, the market will see whether the pricing change delivered the returns they expected. Strong results could signal that further price adjustments are coming. Weaker results might create space for negotiation.
The competitive landscape is shifting. Rival TMS providers are getting more attention than they have in years. The longer forwarder frustration persists, the more momentum alternatives will build. For mid size forwarders in particular, the cost of switching may start to look more attractive than the cost of staying.
Shipper pushback will become clearer. The industry is still testing whether forwarders can successfully pass automation fees to shippers. Early signals from January and February 2026 suggest that most cannot do this without risking their competitive position. A few forwarders have reported customers balking at the new line item on their invoices. Others have quietly absorbed the cost rather than lose accounts. How this dynamic settles will determine whether the Value Pack model becomes a margin squeeze or an industry accepted pass through.
This week:
This month:
This quarter:
Ready to explore your options?
Many mid-size forwarders are discovering that ocean freight solutions designed for their scale offer better value than enterprise platforms. For a detailed feature-by-feature analysis, see our CargoWise vs GoFreight comparison.
Schedule a Demo → to see what predictable pricing looks like in practice.